• 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 10th, 2023

help-circle



  • VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneRule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maybe I am, because no one’s given me a better explanation of it than “having kids bad”

    Just pulling straight from Wikipedia, “Antinatalism or anti-natalism is the philosophical value judgment that procreation is unethical or unjustifiable” and I can’t see how that doesn’t lead to the conclusion that the planet is better off with humans being extinct.

    Every argument I’ve heard boils down to “it’s easier just to die than to fix the problems that make life miserable, so we should all just die.” If you want to give up, go ahead. I personally don’t want to ever have kids, but I still want the world to be better for those who do.


  • VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneRule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Again, if it’s your personal choice to not reproduce, that’s totally fine, and I won’t try to convince you otherwise.

    As soon as you start telling other people though that producing offspring is inherently unethical and they’re a bad, selfish person for making that decision, you’re no different than the so-called “pro-life” groups, telling people that they’re morally flawed and the cause of all the problems in the world because you don’t agree with the choice they made about their reproductive system.

    The options with antinatalism are:

    1. No one reproduces and humans go extinct.
    2. Someone has to make a decision regarding who can “ethically” reproduce to maintain some stable population level.

    Option 1 is unacceptable to me because it means giving up, and at that point we might as well nuke everything to speed up the process of ending the suffering that is life. And if that’s the outlook you have, I genuinely feel bad for you.

    Option 2 is unacceptable because — surprise surprise — that’s just eugenics dressed up as caring about the environment or something. And when you and your loved ones are part of groups that have historically been forcibly sterilized at best and sent to death camps at worst, you tend to have a negative opinion about any philosophy that ultimately labels some groups as unworthy of existing.




  • VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoScience Memes@mander.xyzAnting
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Genuine question, do other countries refer to their current government as “this administration” or “the [leader] administration”?

    In my exposure to non-US political discussions, there seems to be more reference to the majority parties or coalitions, where that’s more important to politics than it is in the US with our far-too-powerful executive branch