• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 12th, 2025

help-circle



  • Paddy66@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlJerkoff
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    That does all sound much more equitable. But don’t you just end up with a different 1% controlling everything, as per every communist state in the past? And isn’t that because not everyone is a worker - you have to have the admin layer at the top, who are deciding what is ‘best for society’, and they can (and due to human nature usually do) most decide what is best for themselves.

    What you describe sounds MUCH better for the majority of people - but I worry about the unaccountability of the ruling admin layer.

    Does communism/socialism have rules for mitigating that (which haven’t been followed by communist states, but could be)?


  • Paddy66@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlJerkoff
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    see, this is the problem - I’ve avoided thinking about politics forever, and now I’m not sure about the main concepts 😂

    I’ve always equated high taxes with socialism - so long as those taxes go towards services and redistribution of wealth.

    OK - so what *is *socialism? (the main tenets)


  • Paddy66@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlJerkoff
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    very interesting points!

    I’ve just started a non-profit (to try to reduce/undermine surveillance capitalism) - and we’ll probably build software along the way. That is entrepreneurship, but not profit focused. However, we would need to be funded and paid to make it work.

    How should I frame this in your way of thinking?


  • Paddy66@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlJerkoff
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was just in Denmark recently and it seems like that’s what they have: a capitalist society but regulated by very socialist policies like (really) high taxes. Makes sense to me - I’m probably just not using the right terminology.


  • Paddy66@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlJerkoff
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    They’re all ‘one-party states’ aren’t they?

    Opposite of democracy… so whether they work well economically is irrelevant, since you’re relying on the party not to become totalitarian. 😬


  • Paddy66@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlJerkoff
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Socialism yes. I’ve always thought that capitalism regulated with socialist policies is the way forward. That way you can still encourage entrepreneurs to get going.

    But we’re still left with the r > g problem (money attracts more money).

    Communism is the extreme end of socialism isn’t it? And I’ve always thought that extremes never work. Extremism is a circle…

    I’m open to being educated on this though…