Pandoc actually does a reasonable job at turning (Pandoc flavored) markdown into man-roff. Sure it doesn’t work for arbitrary markdown but it’s good enough to avoid writing roff by hand.

The main reason I see for not doing that (and using something like scdoc instead) is that you end up with a Haskell toolchain in your dependency graph.

But /etc/fstab has the same UUID for every drive, I have no idea what to do with it.

That would be because every entry (except /boot and /tmp) is a subvolume of the same btrfs volume. Your other drives just aren’t in there.

You might want to read man fstab and maybe the Arch wiki pages for fstab and NTFS. It’s not that difficult as long as you make sure to not reboot with a broken fstab (using nofail is also a good idea). And yes you can just mount them to /media if you want, as long as the mount point is an empty directory.

Ubuntu Studio might have achieved this in a different way but since you’re in Arch land now it’s probably better to do what the Arch documentation recommends.

From what I can tell, it has to do with the drives mounting on /run/media, and apparently /run is a temp folder or something.

Probably not. Yes /run is a tmpfs, but that doesn’t affect any other filesystems mounted inside of it - those have their own permissions (or don’t in the case of FAT).

Since the drives are being mounted in /run/media they’re probably being mounted by your file manager, not via /etc/fstab. You could instead have them mounted on boot by the root user via /etc/fstab (the classic way) or systemd.mount (slightly friendlier), or configure polkit to allow mounting drives without a password (more reasonable if you’re talking about external or thumb drives).

The permission issue is probably for a different reason. Are you sure the filesystem(s) you’re mounting supports POSIX style permissions? FAT doesn’t, and NTFS requires a special flag for it. The files might look like they have permissions, but they’re coming from the mount options and modifying them will either fail outright or not do anything.

Edit: Run lsblk -f to see all connected drives, partitions and file systems and their file system type.

I’m not much of a one-liner collector but I like this one:

vim +copen -q <(grep -r -n <search> .) 

which searches for some string and opens all instances in vim’s quickfix list (and opens the quickfix window too). Navigate the list with :cn and :cn. Complex-ish edits are the obvious use case, but I use this for browsing logs too.

Neovim improves on this with nvim -q - and [q/]q, and plenty of fuzzy finder plugins can do a better version using ripgrep, but this basic one works on any system that has gnu grep and vim.

Edit:

This isn’t exactly a command, but I can’t imagine not knowing about this anymore:

$ man grep
/  -n       # double space before the dash!

brings you directly to the documentation of the -n option. Not the useless synopsis or any other paragraphs that mention -n in passing, but the actual doc for this option (OK, very occasionally it fails due to word wrap, but assuming the option is documented then it works 99% of the time).

The GNU utils vs BSD utils issue should be easy to work around with a bit of symlinking and PATH modification:

> type find
find is /bin/find

> type gfind
gfind is /usr/local/bin/gfind

> sudo mkdir -p /usr/local/opt/gnuutils/bin/
> sudo ln -s /usr/local/bin/gfind /usr/local/opt/gnuutils/bin/find

> PATH="/usr/local/opt/gnuutils/bin:$PATH" type find
find is /usr/local/opt/gnuutils/bin/find

or in script form:

#!/bin/sh
# install as /usr/local/bin/gnu-run
# invoke as gnu-run some-gnu-specific-script script-args
export PATH="/usr/local/opt/gnuutils/bin:$PATH"
exec "$@"

/usr/local/opt/... is probably not the best place to put this but you get the idea, you can make it work with POSIX tools. I don’t know that much about Chimera Linux but I’d be very surprised if nobody has thought of doing this systematically, e.g. as part of a distributable package.

This is probably the main reason every mainboard has TPMs now, since all common operating systems (Android, iOS/MacOS and Windows) do it.

From what I heard the Ubuntu installer offers a version that doesn’t suck (if secure boot is enabled at install time) so using that is probably fine, but I would beware of trying to DIY it since it’s easy to do incorrectly, most guides are wrong, and you will likely end up with easily bypassable encryption.

Nix in single user mode can apparently work with SELinux in enforcing mode, although AFAIK binaries installed via Nix can not have SELinux metadata which could be an issue for some programs.

Determinate Nix claims to have seamless integration with SELinux (unlike upstream Nix and Lix, but it’s not a fork, alright whatever you say Eelco). Using that and removing the proprietary garbage their installer also adds might be easier than making regular Nix play nice with it.

My understanding is that most of this is down to ARM’s (relative) lack of standardization. Consumer ARM SoCs don’t even have ACPI, so you aren’t even guaranteed to be able to do things like powering off the system. Qualcomm pretty much has to add some minimum support for their SoCs to the kernel because most of their consumers will want to get Android working on them, but that doesn’t mean they’ll do more than they have to for that.

There’s a reason you can install Linux on any x86 PC and it will mostly work, but you can’t install an ARM Linux on a phone. Even Android forks like Lineage don’t support all Android phones, even though they’re shipping basically the same thing the manufacturers are.

If your privileged user doesn’t have a password, in some cases this could lead to any program being able to elevate their privilege quietly, unlike UAC.

I think this is the most important part. There really isn’t any protection against random processes trying to do some version of exec sudo $0 except for the fact that it requires a password.

The FSF says this is the case but the actual legal situation is less clear, especially in the EU. Linking does not necessarily constitute a derivative work. Even decompilation of a (proprietary) library in order to link to it might be acceptable depending on the circumstance.

This isn’t something that can be fixed with a license, it’s a direct result of EU copyright law. Historically companies have tended to err on the side of the FSF interpretation, but it is on somewhat shaky grounds.

Sure it’s a problem when that happens. It’s not the only problem, and honestly in the case of coreutils it’s not really the most relevant one.

Do you think it’s likely that corporations will take over UNIX-likes with proprietary coreutils extensions forked from uutils? Because that’s the one thing that is legal to do with an MIT/BSD licensed coreutils but not with GPL licensed ones.

GPL has been battle tested in court

Well… parts of it have been. Others have not. Notably the FSFs view on whether or not linking to a GPL-licensed library constitutes a derivative work (and triggers the GPLs virality) is not universally shared by legal scholars. In the EU in particular linking does not necessarily create derivative works, despite what the FSF says. This has not been tested in court.

Some other parts like the v3 anti-tivoization hasn’t gone to court either, but that has lesser ramifications (assuming you’re not TiVo).

THAT’S how we have corporations profiting from GPL. Not because GPL allows anyone to use it.

What distinction are you trying to draw here exactly? They can do it precisely because the GPL (v2) allows it. The GPLv3 has some extra restrictions but doesn’t do anything about closed source drivers (beyond the linking thing) or the Google Play Services type of proprietary extensions.

Funny you say that because OS X shipped (and probably still ships) plenty of copyleft licensed software such as Bash. The Linux kernel is used in Android and ChromeOS.

If you want to stop corporations from profiting off your work, putting a GPL on it isn’t gonna do it. In fact no free software license will do it, because by definition they allow anyone to use and ship your software.

All of the 5 people who use (non-ESR) Firefox on their 2002 Pentium 4s will certainly be very unhappy about this.

I have this in my config:

function lastcmd
    echo $history[1]
end

abbr --add "!!" --position anywhere --function lastcmd

I believe I originally got this implementation from the GitHub issues. The key is that abbreviations can also call functions, which can in turn index into the history list. We also need to specify that we want the expansion even if we’re in an argument to another command, such as in sudo !!.

This is by no means complete, but the features that I value would be:

• <Tab> cycles though completions as it should instead of duplicating the prompt.
• Completions also show help text (if there’s a provider for one). For example on git <Tab> it shows a short message describing what the command does. JJ goes further: jj diff -r <Tab> shows part of the commit message for the offered commits.
• There are just more completions than in any other shell I know. Aside from JJ the new Nix CLI also has great Fish completions and can dynamically complete flake outputs like package names.
• Entire commands can be history completed with <C-E> or <Right>. This completion is also directory-aware and can usually avoid suggesting commands with paths to files that don’t exist. In practice I find that it’s really good at suggesting the command I actually want to run, to the point that I rarely invoke FZF anymore.
• Abbreviations are in most cases better aliases since they do the same thing but don’t obscure what you’re actually running.
• No word splitting when expanding variables, because it’s never what you intended.
• Globs that fail to match anything are errors instead of silently doing the wrong thing.
• Control structures are a bit nicer (but that is subjective).

You can get most of these with liberal use of shell options, installing blesh, or alternatively installing zsh with a bunch of plugins, but Fish just has all of them out of the box. You don’t even need bash-completions.

how hard is it to transition?

It has a reputation of being very difficult from the past when it didn’t have &&/|| but I think today plenty of Linux users would not even notice. The most notable remaining differences are setting variables (requires the set builtin unless used to modify the environment for a single command), control structures (irrelevant in interactive use) and lack of !! (but you can make an abbreviation to bring it back).

I hear a lot of people talk about the CachyOS kernel, but from this benchmark it seems like the optimizations used for the packages is as relevant (or even more so). It’s also interesting that while distro-wide -O3 is basically useless, x86_64-v3 actually makes a significant difference. Unless openSUSE is doing other things that Phoronix doesn’t highlight?

The term used is “Solução final”, and it’s a pretty literal translation. It’s absolutely possible to make the connection between the terms, but it does require bot ha somewhat in-depth education on the Holocaust and some linguistic sense. Now it’s entirely possible that LGFaé’s history teachers really dropped the ball on the first part, but it’s not clear to me that this is what must’ve happened here.

Speaking for myself I would be embarrassed but not especially surprised if some phrase that I use frequently has a similarly unfortunate meaning, especially regarding an African or Asian genocide. As bad as all genocides are, you just can’t be well educated on all of them, especially with just a regular K-12/A-level/equivalent history education which also has to do things like teaching people how to read (something most of the world is currently failing at).

Not sure how you’re arriving at that low of a difference unless the US pricing is wildly better than in the EU.

If I follow the most obvious user flow on the Framework website (except for removing components that aren’t required) then I end up with a preorder for a Framework 16 with a Ryzen AI 7 350, 8 GB of RAM and no storage for 1,724 €. I can get the same CPU in a Gigabyte Aero X16 with the same CPU and 32GB RAM and storage and an RTX 5060 on top for 1,129 €. If I try to configure the Framework to be actually competitive with that model I end up at 2,384 €. It’s not just the Ryzen AI model that’s like this either, I did the same comparison with an older Ryzen CPU and it was in the same ballpark.

I’m sure the Framework is nicer in many aspects that don’t show up on data sheets like chassis finish and build quality (and of course Linux support) but that’s a lot of money.

I think Matugen is the closest (maintained) thing to what you’re asking for.

If you use a standalone Wayland compositor you might also be interested in the newest generation of “shells” (or more accurately, Quickshell dotfiles) like DMS or Noctalia. These usually also use Matugen under the hood to make their theme settings work.