To me these are just not real concerns. I’m not trying to invalidate yours but I write a lot of code per day and I just run a cleanup tool after to match the teams style - I do a lot of consulation work in big teams and fighting for code-style issue does nothing I feel.
I prefer to adopt the current guideline and fix real problems and fight real battles like making sure the code is testable from the get go and that OpSec is respected.
Why is it better ?
I don’t have a strong opinion, taking the style of the team I work with but why do you feel it is better?
It’s not like putting it on the other line causes any issue.
For sure, the republicans are worst.
But the dems are still not good.
Americans have no representation at all.
I really wonder how it would work in a country that big in empty spaces and populations with so much authoritarian actors.
Each county has a well armed police force. Nearly each state has an armed force millitia. The country has a national guard. It also has several armed agencies. It has the three biggest armies on earth if you separate each corp and only count active soldiers. It has so much millitary equipment the overflow gets sold to polices.
Those armed millitia are all in different counties, are smaller than the local police forces, with less weapon and next to no organizational know how… They would never be able to have any other impact than get outgunned in a remote place by cops or the national guard…
Unless they all start to cause chaos at the same time, which would maybe lead to a semi destabilization of some part of the USA, I don’t see these people with guns achieve anything.
Also most people who wants guns are scared/anxious persons and will talk loud about using them but won’t act when it’s time, because their real motivation is hiding a percived weaknesses with a weapon.
That’s why in all the years of abuse by the insurance system in America, there was only one Luidgi.
No,
Serious teams know that building big software is hard and that starting by having a set deadline is the first failure point of a project.
Serious team wants a set budget and feature set. They also want a dialog with the aquiring party, because as you dig deeper in the software you uncover oddities. These oddities are more often than not a failure of the aquiring party understanding of their own business operations.
And thus, a serious team will help the aquiring party refine their business process by either removing useless steps, adding missings steps or changing a step in the overall workflow. And that’s were the most of the value of making a new software comes from.
Doing waterfall will stop this from happening and will remove actual value from the software because it’s going to be bloated with useless things that were badly understood by the aquiring party.
Agile is about producing as much value as possible, as fast as possible, in a set budget.
English is my third language so sorry if it’s hard to understand or feel aggressive.
I have no idea what I’m talking about but would that be enough to replace the magnetosphere? From what I understand, a Magnetosphere is needed to have a sustainable colony, unless this has been disproved recently …
I don’t feel like I have to discuss with someone who clearly is in bad faith.
Go learn about a subject before talking about it, that’s it. All you said was petulant bullshit. Go read La conquete du pain or something before talking about anarchy, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and instead are reugitating speudo-intellectual word salad.
If you’re so fragile you feel you need to block me, i have no words for you other than : go touch grass, go read about your subjet and come back a better person.
I wish you well!
I never said anything like that. I never said i beleived in anarchy. You just are factually wrong on all counts.
Go read the anarchist philosophers, you’ll see what I mean.
You are still writing word salad by the way… Really … Touch grass, read a book about the subject you want to talk about and come back a changed person!
I wish you well!
Well, I don’t understand why you think anarchist means no rules.
It means no hierarchy.
It’s even the whole word itself.
An-Archy. Hier-archy.
So your thesis is based on wrong assumptions and is a word salad from my point of view.
I like the sentiment but aa is … Urgh…
But yeah this looks like a call for help.
It’s useful if you just don’t do…That. it’s just a new fancy search engin, it’s a bit better than going to stack overflow, it can do good stuff if you go small.
Just don’t do whatever this post suggested of doing…