2000s: Actually, fish aren’t fish
https://www.sciencealert.com/actually-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-fish-say-cladists
- 0 Posts
- 330 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: August 10th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
20·4 days agothen why the fuck is this newsworthy? ugh. Why is there such a huge hateboner for firefox lately?
modern cpus has an energy density on par with nuclear power plant cores.
they need cooling, money cant break physics.
19·12 days agofun fact, the RFC introducing NAT calls it a “short-term solution”
wow why is this getting downvotes for admitting a mistake?
Did you even read the text you shared? It just says he left mozilla.
nah I think it’s Linus
come on now, let them cook, trust the process
they wrote ass backwards ass backwards. It’s a joke, not self censorship.
Not dietal calories.
The calorie numbers we assign to food, measure how much energy our body extracts from them when eaten.
In this context, plutonium is closer to 0
If we instead want to measure the actual total physical energy content of materia, we would turn to E=mc^2, telling us that a gram of anything has about 20 million kcal, no matter if its plutonium or diet coke. which is a slightly less useful value on food labels :D
This headline… do I smell toast?
9·2 months agoA screwdriver beat a hammer in a screw driving competition. well done.
Maybe it sounds impressive when hammers are super hyped and everyone and their mother is driving their screws with them, but it honestly really isn’t.
“Harvard scientist Rachel Greene”
Everyone’s happy
It’s the gorillast of them all
we use language in different contexts. In the food store “fruit” has one meaning, while in a botany paper, it has another.
This doesn’t say theres no such thing as fish generally, it says there is no useful definition for it in a biological setting.