I wish it were true, but no, not really.

Is that what interactive rebase tools use?

I don’t do CLI git

Huh. Never thought of it that way. I was never bothered by a long commit history at all. Search and filter tools in the git client always get me where I want.

The one issue I have is when there are way too many extant branches and the graph takes up happy half my screen.

But that’s more of a Fork issue than it is a fundamental one. The Fork dev could conceivably find a solution for that.

Either way, I guess I see what you mean. I’m just not that strict about commits. Commits just for the linter aren’t a thing since we have a pre-commit hook for that, and typo-fixing commits… Well, they happen, but they’re typically not numerous enough that I’d find them to be any sort of issue.

As for whether I’d really want to revert a particular change – while I work, yes. Afterwards, I see what you mean; i could probably squash 50 commits into 15 or something. But when I think about the time investment of reviewing every commit and thinking about how they ought to be grouped together before making my merge request… I have a lot of trouble convincing myself it’s a good time investment.

Maybe I’d think otherwise if we had a huge team. We have maybe 10 devs on this project at any given time.

That’s a good explanation of what it’s supposed to do. That was how I understood it as well.

But anytime I’ve tried it, I’ve ended up with conflicts where there shouldn’t be (like, I already solved that conflict when I merged earlier) and/or completely undesirable results in the end (for instance, some of my changes are just NOT in the result).

So I just gave up on the whole feature. Simpler to just merge the source branch into mine.

Hmm, I’m less afraid of force push. It does what it says on the tin. If I pushed a fuck-uo to remote and a reset is the simplest way out, you can bet I’m force-pushing that reset.

Why would you want to squash? Feels weird to willingly give up history granularity…

I don’t understand it. Every time I see something about a rebase it’s some purist telling me it’s “cleaner”. Never got it to do what it says on the tin, and never hit a situation that I couldn’t solve using more straightforward tools like merge.

As long as you never touch the rebase button, you’ll be fine. Probably.

Because my PC is an entertainment box. I don’t want to turn it into a problem to solve.

Also, Nvidia.

Appropriate title. Character is such an edgelord.

Curie looks tired. If I’m gonna embarrass myself with anyone anyway, I’ll invite her and we’ll have a relaxing cup of herb tea at least.

Did you just note Typescript, a superset of JavaScript that needs to be compiled into it, as closer to the system?

Also does it technically constitute a language? That feels like a stretch too.

Oh boy why are people like this.

There aren’t many Jewish people here so by proxy I’ve never seen antisemitism in person. I’m not well-placed to talk at all.

That said, it’s hard not to wonder whether the term antisemitism isn’t being used abusively…

I mean so far we haven’t given them much reason to think otherwise.

I’ll be honest I personally assumed ducks only ate fish.

If that doesn’t reveal anything, maybe try to get your hands on a dirt cheap alternate GPU. Memory and GPU would also be my two possible suspects.

Also GPU driver I guess but I feel like you wouldn’t be alone with the issue then.

Astrophysicists are like an oversensitive grandma who hears an electric guitar and thinks nearly every music is metal

I miss the old days when I didn’t know that exists

Did they really not vote for it? I feel like right-wing people might actually want this sort of inhumane mass expulsion.