So you raise an argument, I respond by telling you it’s not the main argument I’m seeing itt, and your response is to point back at your singular comment?

Don’t get me wrong, I agree with you 100%, but most people here are just mad they can’t get YT for free as easily anymore.

Yes, as is the right of the company as it’s their service. People pretend it’s unfair for Google to monetise YT and they should get access to YT unrestricted just because they found a way to use add blockers. Yt is free to try and monetise their service as good as they can, whether we like it or not

I’m not saying the ads on Yt are acceptable, there’s no argument from me there. I’m saying a lot of people here are saying a company charging time or money for their services is wrong, and I disagree with that. It’s fair for Google to charge or give ads, and it’s fair for us to flock away because of it.

Google owes you nothing, and you don’t owe Google anything either.

Well I’ve seen a few comments calling it greed and saying Google already earns enough money.

But why do you expect the singular company that deals with ads to throw you a bone and allow you to block ads? Of course they are going to try to make more money.

I get that losing something you previously had access to is frustrating, but people here act like they should have the privilege to get YouTube for free. That’s not how a company works.

Who here expected a company like this to pass up on making more money by allowing add blockers? You were cheating the system, and the system caught up. It sucks. Either find a new way to cheat the system or accept that they won.

The discussions I’m seeing are not about the contents of the ads but simply because they can’t bypass them anymore.

It’s not even value at this point. They are so rich it doesn’t have an impact on their lives anymore if they slave us all 4 more hours every week, and yet they want to keep squeezing.

The world is a strange place.

Cooking.