Yes!! That’s what Technologieoffenheit (“openness” to technology) is all about!! Building cars that cannot meaningfully be improved upon, that destroy our environment and pollute our cities. If we just dream hard enough we can stop the world from turning and continue selling those marvelous machines.

Sure, we have to heavily support them financially, nobody’s going to buy them, that much is obvious. But at the same time fuck those struggling people, damn leeches!

I disagree, there’s quite a lot. Granted, the Depths can get a little repetitive but there’s nevertheless a lot to explore. Same goes for the Sky. There are whole dungeons to be found.

The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom.

I’m not sure if I really prefer it to Breath of the Wild which was a very impressive game and literally sets the stage for TotK but the the possibility to explore this somewhat familiar map vertically was a lot of fun for me.

I studied biology but somehow completely dodged the Krebs cycle. Memorizing technical terms never really was my passion so I didn’t really mind.

Sadly, the capital has stronger weapons and professional fighters on its side to fight for their interests: soldiers. I don’t see how civilians owning guns would help, especially if some of them support a fascist regime and would fight for them.

I’m afraid your logic doesn’t hold up.

We can agree that humans have violent tendencies and that some will inevitably act on them. But let’s flip your argument: if people are violent and will always find a way to harm others, should we then legalize automatic weapons? But why stop there? Explosives? Heavy artillery? Personal nukes?

Maybe we can agree that limiting an individual’s capacity for violence is a sensible goal. Most countries restrict access to guns which seems like a reasonable place to draw the line.

Online marketplace paid just $18m in corporation tax, leading campaigners to call for government action.

Jaha, ganz toll! Jetzt geht es sicherlich wieder aufwärts, die Wirtschaft ist gerettet!! Die Ärmsten sollen hungern, damit die darüber auch schön spuren. Ein Plan, der kaum christlicher oder sozialer sein könnte…

So ist es. 25 % der Verkehrsministerien werden von Personen aus der SPD besetzt. Falls du darauf hinweisen willst, dass ebensoviele Grüne das mitgetragen haben, gebe ich dir absolut Recht. Eine absolute Schande und nicht im Sinne des Umwelt- oder Klimaschutzes.

Von der Verbrenner-Union erwarte ich nichts anderes aber das die “Sozial”-Demokraten das mittragen ist ein weiterer Punkt in einem immer länger werdenden Armutszeugnis. Das diese ehemalige Volkspartei in der Bedeutungslosigkeit versinkt, kann wirklich niemanden überraschen.

Thank you for your service 🫡

Hast du es nicht mitbekommen? Die Grünen machen “Realpolitik” und alles links davon ist ein marxistischer pipe dream. Nur der Markt vermag uns noch zu retten!

Do you even understand what you’ve unleashed by casually suggesting we just switch the b-pawn and the c-pawn. Do you grasp the sheer, cosmic disrespect dripping from that throwaway remark. I have spent nights, literal nights, staring at a board lit only by the pale glow of my monitor, moving pawns back and forth like some deranged monk praying to a god of sixty-four squares, and you come in here tossing pawns around like you are rearranging fridge magnets.

Do you know what it feels like to live and breathe this game. To see pawns not as little plastic blobs but as ancient warriors carrying the burden of civilizations on their tiny, hunchbacked shoulders. I have woken up in a cold sweat whispering “c4” because somewhere deep inside me I know the soul of the English Opening is demanding sacrifice. I have stared down a lone passed pawn marching with all the inevitability of death itself, and you think you can just waltz in here and say “haha maybe b and c are different tiers.” Do you understand how deranged that makes me feel.

Every pawn is a life. Every pawn is a tragedy. The a-pawn is a lonely pilgrim doomed to shuffle into the abyss, unprotected, unloved. The d-pawn is Atlas himself, straining under the weight of the center, shouldering centuries of theory and repertoires. The f-pawn is a grotesque, cursed creature whose advance is a cry for help from players who want nothing but chaos. And the h-pawn, god, the h-pawn is not even a pawn, it is a philosophical statement, it is the question “do you believe in God” pressed into algebraic notation.

And here you are. Suggesting we swap b and c. Like this is all some kind of sick joke. Like there aren’t grown men in Siberia right now freezing their fingers off over correspondence games where the fate of the world hinges on whether that c-pawn advances one square or two. Like there aren’t entire generations of players buried under the weight of misplayed minority attacks. Like pawn structure is a thing you can just casually edit, like some toddler banging away at a Lego set.

You don’t get it. You’ll never get it. Because chess isn’t just a game. Chess is the grinding inevitability of entropy disguised as sixty-four squares. It is the poetry of futility. And pawns are the syllables. So the next time you feel the urge to swap pawns in a meme, remember this: you are not ranking pawns. The pawns are ranking you.

I’ll try iNaturalist first but if that doesn’t work for my use case I’ll have a look at Seek. Thank you.

Cool, thanks for bringing it to my attention.

Ah wow, that’s great! I’ll have a look.

That sounds very promising. Thanks for the info.

I think it’s 1500. The placing games will make it a little less painful, true.

I would love to like lichess more but the chess.com UI is simply superior, IMHO. Maybe I should just use it and get used to it but I would probably lose the first dozen or so games as your starting ELO is kinda high.

I’m still looking for a good app to identify insects (mostly in Europe). Is iNaturalist the best?