• 1 Post
  • 62 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 22nd, 2024

help-circle


  • Do you even understand what you’ve unleashed by casually suggesting we just switch the b-pawn and the c-pawn. Do you grasp the sheer, cosmic disrespect dripping from that throwaway remark. I have spent nights, literal nights, staring at a board lit only by the pale glow of my monitor, moving pawns back and forth like some deranged monk praying to a god of sixty-four squares, and you come in here tossing pawns around like you are rearranging fridge magnets.

    Do you know what it feels like to live and breathe this game. To see pawns not as little plastic blobs but as ancient warriors carrying the burden of civilizations on their tiny, hunchbacked shoulders. I have woken up in a cold sweat whispering “c4” because somewhere deep inside me I know the soul of the English Opening is demanding sacrifice. I have stared down a lone passed pawn marching with all the inevitability of death itself, and you think you can just waltz in here and say “haha maybe b and c are different tiers.” Do you understand how deranged that makes me feel.

    Every pawn is a life. Every pawn is a tragedy. The a-pawn is a lonely pilgrim doomed to shuffle into the abyss, unprotected, unloved. The d-pawn is Atlas himself, straining under the weight of the center, shouldering centuries of theory and repertoires. The f-pawn is a grotesque, cursed creature whose advance is a cry for help from players who want nothing but chaos. And the h-pawn, god, the h-pawn is not even a pawn, it is a philosophical statement, it is the question “do you believe in God” pressed into algebraic notation.

    And here you are. Suggesting we swap b and c. Like this is all some kind of sick joke. Like there aren’t grown men in Siberia right now freezing their fingers off over correspondence games where the fate of the world hinges on whether that c-pawn advances one square or two. Like there aren’t entire generations of players buried under the weight of misplayed minority attacks. Like pawn structure is a thing you can just casually edit, like some toddler banging away at a Lego set.

    You don’t get it. You’ll never get it. Because chess isn’t just a game. Chess is the grinding inevitability of entropy disguised as sixty-four squares. It is the poetry of futility. And pawns are the syllables. So the next time you feel the urge to swap pawns in a meme, remember this: you are not ranking pawns. The pawns are ranking you.

















  • Danke fürs Teilen. Er nennt einige spannende Punkte. Die aktuelle Ohnmacht in Gesellschaft und Politik hat er ganz interessant dargestellt. Der oft unausgesproche und ebenso aussichtslose Wunsch der meisten Parteien, zu einem “gestern” zurückzukehren, in dem der Westen unangefochten an der Spitze der Weltwirtschaft steht und diese Position zu seinen Vorteilen ausnutzt, wird anschaulich beleuchtet.

    Auch die Beschreibung, wonach die Angst der Klimakatastrophe der Angst vor Russland weicht, ist meiner Meinung nach akkurat. Klimawandel und Artensterben schreiten unvermindert voran, spielen im politischen Diskurs aber überhaupt keine Rolle mehr.

    Zurecht kritisieren kann man Precht dafür, dass er in seinen Lösungsansätzen dann viel zu unkonkret bleibt. Er zeigt sich kapitalismuskritisch aber geht dann nicht weit genug zu benennen, was danach folgen soll. Sich zum Abschluss auf “bürgerliche Initiative” als Hoffnungsträger zu stützen, zeugt meiner Meinung nach nur davon, dass er ebenfalls bereits aufgegeben hat.