cm0002@lemmy.world to Linux@programming.dev · 4 days agoThe Ongoing BcacheFS Filesystem Stability Controversyhackaday.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up139arrow-down12
arrow-up137arrow-down1external-linkThe Ongoing BcacheFS Filesystem Stability Controversyhackaday.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Linux@programming.dev · 4 days agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-squareColloidal@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·4 days agoThe lead developer certainly doesn’t. He maintains that it’s got several systems in production.
minus-squarewhaleross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 days agoOh, wow look at that. Last time I checked it was still ~“for testing purposes only, do not use in production”.
minus-squareColloidal@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·4 days agoAnd that’s Linus’ doing, mostly. Kent insists it is production ready. I wouldn’t touch it with a 10-foot pole, at least for now.
minus-squarewhaleross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 days agoYep, me neither. I’m looking forward to see how it compares with zfs and btrfs when it is ready, but for now I wouldn’t consider it for anything.
The lead developer certainly doesn’t. He maintains that it’s got several systems in production.
Oh, wow look at that. Last time I checked it was still ~“for testing purposes only, do not use in production”.
And that’s Linus’ doing, mostly. Kent insists it is production ready. I wouldn’t touch it with a 10-foot pole, at least for now.
Yep, me neither. I’m looking forward to see how it compares with zfs and btrfs when it is ready, but for now I wouldn’t consider it for anything.