cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 25 days agoMicrotransactions for devslemmy.mlimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1478arrow-down16cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1472arrow-down1imageMicrotransactions for devslemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 25 days agomessage-square37fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squarenintendiator@feddit.cllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down2·24 days agoIf you can read the code it writes and modify it, a project manager can remove that time from you and take the AI slop direct to production.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·24 days agoAnother good reason to never let the company’s project become your project.
minus-squareScrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 days agoThat’s a different problem. The original question was when would a competent dev use an LLM.
minus-squarenintendiator@feddit.cllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 days agoWhich the answer is: never. If they did, by definition they would not be competent (unless they are being specifically trained in how to avoid code slop).
If you can read the code it writes and modify it, a project manager can remove that time from you and take the AI slop direct to production.
Another good reason to never let the company’s project become your project.
That’s a different problem. The original question was when would a competent dev use an LLM.
Which the answer is: never. If they did, by definition they would not be competent (unless they are being specifically trained in how to avoid code slop).