Occhioverde@feddit.it to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agoInsufferablelemmy.mlimagemessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1709arrow-down12cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up1707arrow-down1imageInsufferablelemmy.mlOcchioverde@feddit.it to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square63fedilinkcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up25·1 month agoMicrosoft always has 20 variants of the same name for maximal confusion. It’s deep in their culture.
minus-squareSocket462@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 month agoThis is SO true! Razor pages extension? .cshtml Blazor component? .razor
minus-squareFaalangst_26@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoAlso true the other way around, things that sound like the same but are actually different: .NET Core, .NET Framework, .NET Standard, .NET Bonus points for Microsoft also often using the term “framework” for labeling .NET (Core). And then there of course also is ASP.NET because of course. Just great.
minus-squareMyNameIsRichard@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoHow else are they going to get you to buy a support contract. If it was easy, you wouldn’t need it.
Microsoft always has 20 variants of the same name for maximal confusion. It’s deep in their culture.
This is SO true!
Razor pages extension? .cshtml Blazor component? .razor
Also true the other way around, things that sound like the same but are actually different:
.NET Core, .NET Framework, .NET Standard, .NET
Bonus points for Microsoft also often using the term “framework” for labeling .NET (Core). And then there of course also is ASP.NET because of course.
Just great.
How else are they going to get you to buy a support contract. If it was easy, you wouldn’t need it.