cm0002@lemmy.world to Linux@programming.dev · 1 month agoOpen source project curl is sick of users submitting “AI slop” vulnerabilitiesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1440arrow-down11
arrow-up1439arrow-down1external-linkOpen source project curl is sick of users submitting “AI slop” vulnerabilitiesarstechnica.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Linux@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-squareDave.@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 month ago Those who use AI to report to open source projects and flood the volunteering devs who keep the World going, should be disqualified from using those open source projects I propose a GPL-noAI licence with this clause inserted.
minus-squareDave.@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 month agoPublic with conditions on behaviour which can lead to your licence being revoked, just like the current GPL. 🤷♂️
minus-squareKissaki@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-229 days agoThe license doesn’t get revoked. It does not apply to things it does not allow in the first place. Some kind of restrictions are easier to describe and assess than others. I doubt someone that generates AI slob reports would care about the restrictions anyway.
I propose a GPL-noAI licence with this clause inserted.
so not GPL at all, then
Public with conditions on behaviour which can lead to your licence being revoked, just like the current GPL. 🤷♂️
The license doesn’t get revoked. It does not apply to things it does not allow in the first place.
Some kind of restrictions are easier to describe and assess than others.
I doubt someone that generates AI slob reports would care about the restrictions anyway.