• ArchRecord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    To anyone bemoaning BlueSky’s lack of federation, check out Free Our Feeds.

    It’s a campaign to create a public interest foundation independent from the Bluesky team (although the Bluesky team has said they support them) that will build independent infrastructure, like a secondary “relay” as an alternative to Bluesky’s that can still communicate across the same protocol (The “AT Protocol”) while also doing developer grants for the development of further social applications built on open protocols like the AT Protocol or ActivityPub.

    They have the support of an existing 501c(3), and their open letter has been signed by people you might find interesting, such as Jimmy Wales (founder of Wikipedia).

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      I feel like the reason the reason why it’s taking off so much is because it’s not federated.

      It’s like people hear the term federation and they get afraid. I know it’s not that simple but still.

      In other words, people don’t know what they actually need.

        • 3dmvr@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah I was confused on if it was connected, if I was explaining it to myself id say that the fediverse has interconnected forums that all serve the same content and can be accessed by making accounts on different websites or apps.

          Lemmy, mbin, piefed, etc. are all ways to access the interconnected forum/threads side of the fediverse.

          Mastodon, sharkey, plaroma, etc. are all ways to access the interconnected microblogging slide of the fediverse.

          They all have different features, like mbin has account reputation, piefed has topics which let you sub to multiple related communities at once, etc., but the content is shared between those that serve the same type of content.

          Since they’re all built ontop of the same protocol ppl can always come in and build on top of it or make hybrids while still letting everyone access the same content. Like mbin having both microblogging (tweets) and threads, letting you post and view both from the same account/website.

          • 3dmvr@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            And it legit takes 5 minutes to sign up for 5 instances and see the differences, mine showed the same content for the most part, only lemmy.world was missing the piracy community, other than that it was all the same and any nervousness I had about it went away after seeing the feeds being the same.

              • spirinolas@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 days ago

                Not only do I don’t mind multiple instances, I welcome it. It’s a feature for me, not a bug. But having to create multiple accounts is a no-no and what keeps people away. People say you only need one but that’s not true if you want to be active in multiple instances.

                If the fediverse had a way to unify account creation, that would be a game changer. It’s pretty much what’s holding the fediverse down, be it Lemmy, Pixelfed, PeerTube, etc. It’s frustrating because without that limitation I could see the corpos being given a run for their money.

              • 3dmvr@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                they should understand by the 2nd one, I just wasnt sure where I wanted to commit, it became fun by the 2nd one to pick an instance like a club

              • 3dmvr@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                there really isnt much friction either if you dont cate about piracy otherwise id have stayed on lemmyworld when vyjr reccomended it, they really just need to try it, I complained until I tried it

      • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I don’t personally think it’s because of that. Sure, federation as a concept outside of email has a bit of a messaging problem for explaining it to newbies, but… everyone uses email, and knows how that works. This is identical, just with it being posts instead of emails. Users aren’t averse to federation, in concept or practice.

        Bluesky was directly created as a very close clone of Twitter’s UI, co-governed and subsequently pushed by the founder of Twitter himself, who will obviously have more reach than randoms promoting something like Mastodon, and, in my opinion, kind of just had better branding.

        “Bluesky” feels like a breath of fresh air, while “Mastodon” just sounds like… well, a Mastodon, whatever that makes the average person think of at first.

        So when you compare Bluesky, with a familiar UI, nice name, and consistent branding, not to mention algorithms, which Mastodon lacks, all funded by large sums of money, to Mastodon, with unfamiliar branding, minimal funding, and substantially less reach from promoters, which one will win out, regardless of the technology involved?

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t think 99% of people who have joined bluesky have any clue what federation is or means. They do know what “not twitter” is however.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is such a half-assed dog and pony show.

      They have millions in investment, why do they need someone else to fund this? Why don’t the bluesky team directly and materially support them?

      This is a core aspect of Bluesky’s marketing and they asking other volunteers to help make them rich.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Until there’s overt advertising its unlikely to enshittify the normal way. That doesn’t mean it won’t, just that a different capital process is at work. Wikipedia has outlived most of “web2.0” because its funded by donations and run by volunteers.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Until there’s overt advertising its unlikely to enshittify the normal way.

          Trust me we will be deep into that territory so fast it is going to make your head spin.

          Wikipedia has outlived most of “web2.0” because its funded by donations and run by volunteers.

          Private equity and VC funding can’t directly buy Wikipedia and dissect it because it is an at least somewhat functional non-profit organization. That is the only reason.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      The only thing the Fediverse is missing is way to migrate from 1 instance to another

      • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        It actually does exist, at least on Mastodon, but is still very janky (e.g. old posts aren’t moved over due to “technical limitations”)

        Automatically makes people unfollow your old account and re-follow your new account, then makes your old instance’s link redirect to your new instance’s one.