• Bogasse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    When I tried darktable as a complete begginer I was completely lost and ended up learning rawtherapee instead. Would you say it changed now?

    Darktable seems more popular than rawtherapee, but is there a big difference feature-wise?

    • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      You do need to figure out which modules to use and how to use some of them, its not too difficult when you have all the right modules.

      A lot of the modules are old/redundant/deprecated, but still there for legacy reasons. They really clutter up the ui

      • aln@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        I went down a rabbit hole of YouTube videos and ultimately ended up on like… One set of settings I pretty much do for most images.

        Lens Correction. Exposure; click eyedropper

        Basic Adjustments. Color Balance RGB Global Saturation 30% Global Chrome 15% Local Contrast Detail 130%

        Filmic RGB. Click black relative exposure Click white relative exposure

        Crop image

        I would love to hear/read some more stuff. I’m an extremely basic photographer who didn’t want to pay for Adobe.

        • crater2150@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          This is mostly what I use too. Additionally, on images with high ISO I usually add the profiled denoise module, often without changing the default values. If the image has a lot of noise, I sometimes use the preset that only reduces chroma noise (so the image stays grainy, but without the color mismatches)

        • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yeah I’d say something like that is my baseline too, usually just some added vibrance instead of saturation on the color balance RGB.

          I think the tone curve, RGB curve, tone equalizer and colour equalizer are useful if you want a bit more if a look in your images

        • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Legacy reasons I suppose, it would suck to go back to a photo you took a while back, only to find out all your edits are gone because the modules you used are removed.

          Some modules get a “deprecated” warning, which imo more modules could use, but there are probably still edge cases where someone might prefer the old modules

    • u_tamtam@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Darktable developers pride themselves for their non-destructive processing pipeline and use it as an excuse for how quirky and inflexible their UX is. I believe they are highly competent on the highly technical bits that ultimately very few people see or understand. Personally I can use it to an extent if I unlearn what other software have taught me over decades of UX conventions.

      • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        One of the developers got sick of the UX issues and forked DT.

        https://ansel.photos

        I only use this stuff occasionally. Is there really a big improvement in ansel over darktable? Or is the ansel dev just super angry for no reason?

        • u_tamtam@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I’ve compared the two a while ago, seems to me like slightly different takes around the same core ideas. It’s true that a couple of things in Ansel feel more natural, but it’s not much, and it’s probably not worth the risk (AFAICT the bus factor is one, compat with DT isn’t a goal).