☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoPride Versioninglemmy.mlimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1595arrow-down14
arrow-up1591arrow-down1imagePride Versioninglemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoeither have meaning to the number and do semantic versioning, or don’t bother and simply use dates or maybe simple increments
minus-squareRogue@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoDate based version numbers is just lazy. There’s nothing more significant about a release in two weeks (2025.x.y) than today (2024.x.y). At least with pride versioning there’s some logic to it.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agothe point is just to have a way to tell releases apart, if every release is version 5 then you’re going to start self harming
either have meaning to the number and do semantic versioning, or don’t bother and simply use dates or maybe simple increments
Date based version numbers is just lazy. There’s nothing more significant about a release in two weeks (2025.x.y) than today (2024.x.y).
At least with pride versioning there’s some logic to it.
the point is just to have a way to tell releases apart, if every release is version 5 then you’re going to start self harming