• Iapar@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    How is mastodon not just a bunch of centralized platforms?

    Sure the servers communicate with each other but the content is still just on one of them. Goes the server, so goes the content.

    Or am I mistaking?

    If it is like I say I feel it is more trading Hitler in for, potentially, a bunch of smaller Hitlers.

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      44 minutes ago

      IIRC the content is on multiple. If there’s a single user on lemmy.world subscribing to content from somewhere.else’s foo community, then foo will be synced to lemmy.world and if somewhere.else is taken down it will remain on lemmy.world.

      But someone correct me if I’m wrong.

      Also, it isn’t just about servers going offline. If a single server does something bad, you can just switch to a different one and enjoy the same content you’ve been seeing.

    • Foni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Well, I am not a systems engineer to answer your question, in any case smaller Hitlers equals Hitlers with less power. Dividing power is not the definitive solution to authoritarianism, but it usually helps a lot, especially if the agents are also competitive. “If you are too Hitler, I’ll go to this other server that is a little less so” is a valid incentive to avoid the Hitlerization of the admins.

      I don’t think I’ve ever used the name Hitler so much.

    • Lanthanae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      a bunch of centralized platforms?

      This is what decentralized means. If your home instance goes to shit, you can just move your account to another one.