I genuinely do not know who the bad guys are. S lot of my leftist friends are against Israel, but from what I know Israel was attacked and is responding and trying to get their hostages back.

Enlighten me. Am I wrong? Why am I wrong?

And dumb it down for me, because apparently I’m an idiot.

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Just count the dead, injured, displaced, starved, and dehydrated on either side. You’ll find pretty quickly the numbers are extremely disproportionate. If that’s [not] a baseline consideration for your judgment then you should think on that.

    [Edit in brackets]

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is absolutely false, hamas is not anti-semitic, they’re anti-zionist. You’re doing the british / murican tabloid thing of equating the two.

        1. Hamas affirms that its conflict is with the Zionist project not with the Jews because of their religion. Hamas does not wage a struggle against the Jews because they are Jewish but wages a struggle against the Zionists who occupy Palestine. Yet, it is the Zionists who constantly identify Judaism and the Jews with their own colonial project and illegal entity.
      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fine but why does one potential future genocide justify the realized genocide currently under way?

    • Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I generally agree that the response seems lopsided. However, I also find it odd that Hamas simply hasn’t returned the hostages. This to me signifies two possibilities- they are not actually interested in peace, or they don’t believe that returning the hostages will stop Israel’s destruction.

      Would that appraisal of the situation seem reasonable?

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not really. Israel has a vested interest in continuing this land grab. The hostages are a convenient excuse, but separate from the inciting event. Furthermore it’s just as likely the hostages have been killed in israeli bombings.

        • Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I see. So you think Israel wants the hostages to be kept in order to give them a public excuse to continue their campaign?

          • untorquer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            No. I said they’re a convenient excuse. If they were to return then a new excuse would be found. The impetus for this campaign started as “self defense” in response to the Oct 7 attack. Then when that was no longer sufficient to justify things they moved onto the hostages as a bargaining chip.

      • finkrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        There is a lot more to this way than just the hostage situation - Israel has been in control of Palestinian territory for a long time (they consider it theirs) and they have been fighting with the Hamas organization for years now. This is the single worst escalation of it.

        Hamas doesn’t want peace. The status quo is domination of Palestine under Israel government - erasure of Palestine effectively if they laid down arms and disbanded. They want liberty, and payback for hardships.

        There isn’t reason to believe Israel will stop the attacks on return of the hostages, as they have gone overwhelmingly above and beyond the total damage done by Hamas (even comparing women and children victims vs. the concert raid that started it all) and given Netanyahu’s far right government is at the helm, so your second point has merit.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hamas wants to trade those hostages for Palestinian hostages. Which have been imprisoned for decades.

        It is a tale of “Israel started it” and the Palestinians have no other possible way to make demands from Israel than using the same tactics.

        Israel openly says they will continue the destruction. Even if Hamas releases the hostages. Their government does not care about hostages. But the Israeli people do. Hamas would be giving up the only leverage they have against Israel by releasing the hostages.

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve made no claims about the ethics of Hamas here. Simply put, genocide is not an act of strategy, and putting the ethics of retaliation aside, does nothing to further the security of your own citizens. Israel has not made its people safer, rather the opposite. It has paved the road to open war with other nations, and is walking it.