• gnutrino@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    The author needs to learn the difference between a blockade and an embargo. Cuba hasn’t been under blockade since the end of the missile crisis.

    • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s very much a blockade in practice since it prevents the vast majority of companies of any country from trading with Cuba.

      There are very few companies that would survive competition by sacrificing trade with the nearby US to trade with Cuba instead the way the “embargo” forces them to.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s an embargo.

        A blockade is military stopping traffic. “Effectively a blockade” is an embargo.

    • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      An embargo would imply its just America that can’t trade with Cuba. In reality, almost nobody can trade with Cuba, because any ship that does cannot enter American ports to trade with America.

      It may not be a blockade by the dictionary definition, but it’s certainly not just an embargo.