• deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Adapt to what?

    If they’re mixing the content with the ads server side, it’s going to be like trying to extract the flour from the bread loaf.

    I’ve never understood why they haven’t just provided a method of doing this for all their customers. Like a Google Ad service that meshes together everything on the page with the ads server side, so it’s harder to target them client side.

    I mean, the dream is to make the Internet like cable television, isn’t it? Where it’s all one signal/stream. When ads could never be targeted and blocked or skipped unless you recorded and played back later with fast forward. Feels like we’ll get there eventually, with Chromium effectively calling the shots now.

    • Gregor@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Google is required by EU law to show what is an ad and what isn’t. Adblockers could somehow detect that and skip forward.

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If they’re predictable with the timing and length then sponsorblock will still work.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        And if they’re not, the client can download the video twice and diff the copies.

        The most pernicious thing they could do is randomize the ads across users, but serve each user the same ads each time. In that case, you’d need a peer-to-peer client to compare hashes of chunks with other users to detect the ad segments.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Dear Satan,

          Your application for the Alphabet engineering position has been acce–[your message will continue after a word from our sponsors]