spujb@lemmy.cafe to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 years agorulekbin.runimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1392arrow-down10
arrow-up1392arrow-down1imagerulekbin.runspujb@lemmy.cafe to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squareLeviathan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 years agoIt makes no sense. Sugar? good, cookie? good, sugar cookie? disgusting insult to its name and whomever has the misfortune of eating one.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·edit-22 years agoComments like these are why downvotes are necessary. For one thing, your implication that all sugar cookies share the sins of this specific kind of sugar cookie? Disgusting. Bigoted. You’re cancelled.
It makes no sense. Sugar? good, cookie? good, sugar cookie? disgusting insult to its name and whomever has the misfortune of eating one.
Comments like these are why downvotes are necessary.
For one thing, your implication that all sugar cookies share the sins of this specific kind of sugar cookie?
Disgusting. Bigoted. You’re cancelled.