Title

  • rufus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s right. To add a few things: X11 isn’t bad. It’s just a big and complex piece of software that has grown for multiple decades. And nobody wants to do big changes or add new things anymore.

    Wayland is the modern and “fresh” new approach. I’ve had some issues with my NVidia graphics card. But that wasn’t Waylands fault, but the NVidia drivers. I have a laptop with just Intel graphics and both X11 and Wayland run excellently on that machine.

    With Linux we often get many choices, and have several alternatives available to do the same / a similar job. That is a bit complicated for someone new. But we should embrace it, be glad that we can pick whatever suits our individual needs. Wayland still has some issues on a few specific setups, but eventually it will replace X11 as the default.

    • neidu2@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember messing around with font servers 25 years ago in XFree86. Are font servers still a thing with X11?

      • rufus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The X font server has been deprecated like 10 years ago. I doubt you’ll find it as an option in a modern distribution. Nowadays fonts are rendered by the client (application) with something like the Cairo library (if I’m not mistaken).