• CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    11 months ago

    I mean, can someone really call themselves a “devil’s advocate” if they’re really just arguing for their own position that just happens to be unpopular with the people around them? My understanding was that the term was supposed to mean something more like arguing for a position that one disagrees with, to ensure that the arguments against that position hold up and strengthen them.

    • RaineV1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      11 months ago

      They won’t actually say it’s their position on issues unless they get enough support. It’s pretending to play devil’s advocate.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s more like a pseudo-devil’s advocate. Someone who claims to just be arguing against a topic for the sake of making a point even though they don’t agree, but actually doesn’t agree with what you said.

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Isn’t the term, “playing devil’s advocate”? Take out the ‘playing’ and all you have is a devils advocate.