• jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think there’s a huge difference between we cannot make a recommendation and you shouldn’t do this.

      The tor FAQ says we cannot endorse this in all scenarios… “generally speaking”

      https://support.torproject.org/faq/faq-5/

      The video makes a reasonable argument that if you can’t trust your ISP not to log, adding a VPN that has less incentive to log you makes sense and in worst case is the same as your ISP logging you so you lose nothing by trying it

      • Saki@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Also, one should consider using Bridges (obfs4), so that your local ISP may not know you’re on Tor. Tails suggests that too. Using a VPS is not necessary a best option for that, though it might be a good option under some situation.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          The video covers that as well, if your bridge becomes discovered later, log traffic can be used to identify your tour usage in the past. And if that’s not acceptable in your threat model, then a VPN still makes sense

          • Saki@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Agreed. It’s an option worth considering (even EFF said so)—in fact a bridge itself could be run by something like Team Cymru (Augury), removed in TB v11.5.4. On the other hand, a VPN could collaborate with “them” so you’ll have to trust them… adding yet another unknown.

            There are many ways to de-anonymoze Tor users indeed. Like Keystroke fingerprinting or Deep Packet Inspection… Usually a local ISP is not a big problem but it depends. The fact remains that even in a country with heavy Internet censorship, currently a nation-state can’t block Tor (via Bridge or Snowflake).

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              The issue of people in oppressive countries, where internet traffic is logged, is that using Tor won’t be blocked, but will mark somebody as a person of interest.

              So there’s a lot of people on this planet who are connected to the internet and have a legal requirement to have their traffic logged. Those people absolutely should be using a VPN, the VPN cannot possibly be worse than their ISP

              • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I believe this is why privacy groups mostly recommend using tor without vpns More users, more traffic, less being a single target in a field