We have another event that invites people over to our side!

    • rainbowbunny@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Keep in mind everyone that Stoat still doesn’t currently protect it’s users information and is centralized. It doesn’t use encryption but it is very seamless.

      You can host your own Stoat instance but it doesn’t communicate with the main one.

      The devs have said they plan to add more security features in the future yet still don’t make it a priority. The host of Stoat should be able to see everyone’s messages, including in DM’s, due to the lack of E2E encryption.

      Once they add more security features I imagine they will be much more popular in general.

      • earthworm@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In my view, security isn’t a feature, it’s a design choice.

        I have no ill wishes towards Stoat, but I’ve never seen a developer convincingly implement security after the fact.

    • WormFood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I looked in stoat’s issue tracker and there is an issue asking for video chat which is 5 years old and still open. Safe to say it’s a dead project.

      • quips@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        Matrix is mature enough, and has a better philosophy. Just the best choice atm.