• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s weird how AI has turned so much of the internet from its generally anti-copyright stance. I’ve seen threads in piracy and datahoarding communities that were riddled with “won’t someone please think of the copyright!” Posts raging about how awful AI was.

    I maintain the same view I always have. Copyright is indeed broken, because of how overly restrictive and expansive it has become. Most people long ago lost sight of what it’s actually for.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The AI topic is botted massively, almost as much as political topics.

      I don’t know who would benefit from a large portion of the Western youth being made to be disinterested in this emerging technology, but it isn’t the Western economies.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Copyright companies and big AI. Google stands to profit massively if they are the only ones with the budget for a “legal” LLM. In any other context, strengthening copyright laws would be met with riots but they have managed to convince a good portion of the population that it’s somehow in their best interest in the space of a year.

        That or China (probably both)

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah, whatever it is, it isn’t just a bunch of suddenly concerned citizens who discovered their love of copyright laws.

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      “Copyright” is an overloaded word that can both mean “IP/copyright law, it’s terms and enforcement” as well as “the rights of an author to decide how their work should be used”

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      In the vein that LLM are just a tool? Wouldn’t it be legally a problem, if a photoshop filter had rules specifically to generate Sonic art?

      Btw, why is that blue hedgehog still a thing? And still protected?