• MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      never once in my economics education did they do that. not just because it’s easier to draw a curve than a straight line, but because the shape of the curve defines the type of good. maybe your economics education was just… bad?

              • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                first: neither brittanica nor investopedia are run by or written by economists. those images were made, probably in excel first, they’re terrible, and then considered done. how much longer does it take to get a set of curves that line up precisely in the center versus a set of straight lines that line up precisely in the center? especially when the point you’re trying to illustrate with your diagram is not (a) the more realistic shape of the utility curves that define the supply and demand curves, but is in fact (b) the equilibrium point at the intersection. it takes a lot longer to get the curves right, right? and that’s not the important part of the model! better to just save 15 seconds and use straight lines, you can illustrate the curves on another diagram

                that is how economists think

                that is why those stupid images are there.