Bit of a simple question: Some people on lemmy are still posting stuff from youtube, xitter and the like.

Have you gone full fediverse yet or how far are you?

  1. traded reddit for lemmy/kbin
  2. xitter for mastodon
  3. discord for matrix
  4. youtube for peertube

Obviously I also mean other alternatives. Which ones do you use and why?

Disclaimer: this question is me asking genuinely but also trying to make it fun by arbitrary ranking/escalating it. Not trying to say one is better than the others.

  • Scrollone@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    And, honestly, I feel like there will never be an alternative to YouTube.

    Hosting video costs a lot of money, it’s not something anyone can do

    • rickdg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      Even if you magically host video, the real challenge is discoverability.

      It’s a bit like how easy it is to replace google maps, but the secret sauce is google places.

      • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I can see how you would think that but peertube is very good bar the discoverability atm. Hosting your own content is easy and cheap. Just the search engine needs to be better. And you need to be able to search all federated servers.

        My example is minecraft. I make videos but if I search minecraft on peertube some random stuff gets pushed for a reason I cant understand.

          • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            You‘re talking about the peer2peer video sharing. Thats an entire different can of worms in my book. Not sure about that either. But youtube and the whole megacorp situation is an abomination that needs to go, no matter the past advances they made. One reason they act anti competitively is because being innovative is hard and risky and they‘d rather get rich securely.

    • hellweaver666@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah the scale of infrastructure needed for video hosting at a scale needed for creators to move over is nutso. The creators won’t move without the audience, the audience won’t move without the creators. Only way it could work is if another “megacorp” decided to take on YouTube and incentivised creators to move.

      Pretty much only Apple and Microsoft have the funds to pull that off.

    • Jajcus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Still, there is place for competition, people just need to stop expecting these services to be completely free of charge. When Google ‘fees’ (data collection and ads) will stop being hidden or easily avoidable other companies will be able to provide similar services for a fair price.

      • MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yup, I’m paying for Nebula which is creator-owned. It doesn’t do everything YouTube does, but it’s a cool direction for the medium to go into - at least to try.