• lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They’re a mesh walkie-talkie, but you don’t need to walkie or talkie 😁

      Meshnet means that if A can see B and B can see C, then A can message C, it’s routed through B automatically.

      Also it’s text only, not enough bandwidth for speech

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          55 minutes ago

          When I think of pagers I think of receiving only, not sending. Meshtastic devices can typically do both.

        • iglou@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          58 minutes ago

          Kind of. But it is my understanding that pagers work with centralised transmitters/stations. I am no expert though, so maybe there is mesh-like pager protocols.

          This is decentralised, a mesh. Routing is done through the terminals themselves, rather than through a centralised transmitter.

    • paequ2@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      walkie talkie

      Yeah, I think so. I saw a video where someone called it “a walkie talkie, but for sending text messages”. People use these for going on remote hikes, hunting trips, or protests. Basically, any area where you can’t use a cellphone. They’re not a replacement for cellphones, they fill a different usecase.