toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 days agorule theorylemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1274arrow-down17
arrow-up1267arrow-down1imagerule theorylemmy.blahaj.zonetoothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squareTommelot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·3 days agoNot an illegal number of rooks though! Any number op to 10 is legal.
minus-squareKittyCat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoIn this case it is illegal, because the real limit is the sum total of all pawns and rooks cannot exceed 10.
minus-squareQuetzalcutlass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 days agoTwo starting rooks, eight promoted pawns.
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 days agoAh, I see the problem: I’m an idiot who forgot chess boards are 8 squares wide, not 10.
Not an illegal number of rooks though! Any number op to 10 is legal.
In this case it is illegal, because the real limit is the sum total of all pawns and rooks cannot exceed 10.
Why 10, not 12?
Two starting rooks, eight promoted pawns.
Ah, I see the problem: I’m an idiot who forgot chess boards are 8 squares wide, not 10.