Silliari@quokk.au to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 14 days agoi don't physically own it, i have a piece of paper in the town hall saying i doquokk.auexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1605arrow-down118 cross-posted to: 196@lemmy.world
arrow-up1587arrow-down1external-linki don't physically own it, i have a piece of paper in the town hall saying i doquokk.auSilliari@quokk.au to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 14 days agomessage-square42fedilink cross-posted to: 196@lemmy.world
minus-squareLushed_Lungfish@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·14 days agoNot quite. I believe the historical consensus is that if you can defend it, you own it.
minus-squareazolus@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 days agoLast time I checked the historical consensus was “they need the state to enforce property rights bc having their own militias to defend their property isn’t feasible”
Not quite. I believe the historical consensus is that if you can defend it, you own it.
Last time I checked the historical consensus was “they need the state to enforce property rights bc having their own militias to defend their property isn’t feasible”