• Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t have any issue with the quality

      Yeah cause it’s lossless, which is why the files are also significantly bigger.

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Go with the times, PNG is old as dirt now. Everything supports Webp!

      /edit: the downvotes are hilarious. People have no problem moving on from mp3 to FLAC or so, but somehow they form an emotional attachment to PNG?

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yes, and webp lossless is really good. JXL lossless is usually better, but either are better than png.

        Random high quality jpeg I found of a screenshot of sheet music:

        Original: 53.3 kb

        JXL: 12.2 kb

        Webp: 25.9 kb

        AVIF: 22.6 kb

        PNG: 47.3 kb

        Most are not anywhere near as favorable, that happened to be the most recent thing in my camera roll. Let me try another:

        Original PNG: 19.0 kb

        JXL: 12.9 kb

        Webp: 15.7 kb

        AVIF: 14.9 kb

        Finally, some larger and photographic content:

        Original PNG: 318 kb

        JXL: 185 kb

        Webp: 247 kb

        AVIF: 201 kb

        Encoder efforts picked to be the highest that would finish in within a few seconds in Image Toolbox on my phone. Webp doesn’t go up as high so it was finishing quicker here, and PNG doesn’t have varying effort afaik

        BTW JXL effort 1 lossless is insanely fast to encode (the order of a gigapixel per second) and also basically always smaller than PNG

        • michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s funny that Google is one of the developers of the JPEG XL format, but neither Chrome nor Android support this format.

          P.S. funny thing №2: title image on jpeg-xl homepage is AVIF.

          • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Makes sense though, since it is the best image format that is actually supported. Probably the best overall outside of lossless now with tune=iq, idk about AV2, h265, or h266 tho.

            The thing is, JXL has a lot of un-exploited potential for better encoding tools within the same codec, mostly from the fact that it has like 5 part time devs compared to the multi-company teams that AOM has.

  • UnGlasierteGurke@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    what’s the bottom right format?

    also, avif and webp are both supported by voyager, firefox and chromium (at least for me) but what software actually supports JPEG XL?

    Image Test

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      JXL is coming very soon actually to Chrome, Firefox, and any up-to-date PDF viewer (they’re adding it to the format)

      Has support in eog, imageglass, whatever that foss galley app on Android is called, a lot of open source software, anything Apple (safari, iOS everywhere)

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      jxl isn’t supported because google has a near monopoly on the web and has historically been very opposed to it (also they basically control Firefox financially)

      most desktop Linux image processing software supports jxl, but only bespoke browsers like waterfox, safari and ladybird have support for it

    • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      I believe both Firefox and Chromium support JXL now, although they probably need to be enabled as an experimental setting.

    • zikzak025@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      I can’t even view OP’s image at all, but it’s just showing as WebP to me? Is Catbox just down?

        • zikzak025@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Wild, you’re right, it’s apparently blocked by my mobile carrier. Tried it again with a VPN and it worked fine.

          So much for the idea of a free and open internet…

          • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            It could just be your DNS, I’ve had problems with Cloudflare’s 1.1.1.1 and Catbox but I think they actually have a list of ISPs and DNS providers that give them issues. I don’t think you can manually specify a DNS server on cellular (without some weird workaround), but if you have issues on other networks you can try changing your DNS and see what happens.

            • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              You can, it’s just a connection type.
              If talking specifically about phones, Android allows specifying DoT, and Firefox on Android has DoH. Or at least Fennec and Nightly do, I don’t use regular Firefox on phone.

  • Wren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG

    Looks at all those PNGs seems like everyone wants to do that.

  • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    I have a script on my machnie that turns every crap webp that I save from Lemmy into glorious JXL.

    Honestly, Lemmy as an anti-Big System protocol/community idea should serve JXL or APNG by default.

    • craftrabbit@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Webp doesn’t support interlacing, so it’s basically worthless

      In all seriousness, it lacks some features, especially when compared to jxl, that stop it from being able to be a universal image format, which is something that jxl wants to achieve. All hail JPEG XL!

      Check this out to see the differences.

  • foodandart@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well, the avif has made it impossible to save viewable images to my system, that’s for sure.

    For some reason not even XNViewMP is touching them, and it claims to be able to.

    (I screengrab the images and if they’re large, make multiple grabs to get the entire image captured then put it together in Photoshop… PITA but what else can I do… gah!)