So Arch just moved to NVIDIA 590 and dropped Pascal support. I’m running an older Predator laptop with a GTX 1070 (Pascal) + Intel iGPU. After the update, NVIDIA is basically gone, but Intel fallback still gives me a working desktop.
This machine was always a fallback gaming laptop, not my primary system, but I’d still like to make reasonable use of it.
My current situation: Arch Linux with KDE Plasma, Intel graphics works fine, NVIDIA 1070 is unusable unless I go legacy, Wayland currently working only because I’m on Intel.
From what I understand: NVIDIA legacy (580xx) = X11 only, Wayland + Pascal is basically dead.
Arch will keep moving kernels, so legacy drivers mean ongoing maintenance…
(picture related).
What I’m trying to decide:
Stick with Arch, install legacy NVIDIA, switch to X11, accept maintenance?
Ditch NVIDIA entirely, run Intel + Wayland, and treat the 1070 as dead weight?
Switch to a slower-moving distro (Debian?) just to keep X11 + NVIDIA working longer?
Or is there a better hybrid setup people are actually happy with?
I’m not looking to resurrect Pascal forever, just trying to choose the least stupid path for a secondary machine without fighting my system every update.
Curious what others with GTX 10xx laptops are actually doing in practice.


I’m no expert but it’s fairly easy to mitigate.
From https://archlinux.org/news/nvidia-590-driver-drops-pascal-support-main-packages-switch-to-open-kernel-modules/
Translates to:
sudo pacman -Rdd nvidia nvidia-lts nvidia-dkmsyay -S nvidia-580xx-dkmsIn attempting this, I still had a conflict with lib32-nvidia-utils, so this should work better:
sudo pacman -Rdd nvidia nvidia-lts nvidia-dkms lib32-nvidia-utilsyay -S nvidia-580xx-dkms lib32-nvidia-580xx-utilsUsing
yay -Syy nvidia-580xx-dkms lib32-nvidia-580xx-utilsmeans you don’t have to manually approve these replacement packages in the process, I think?EndeavourOS, BTW