ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoIt happened again rulediscuss.onlineexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1697arrow-down17
arrow-up1690arrow-down1external-linkIt happened again rulediscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squaremuusemuuse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 months agoYou don’t need to see the content on the phone just identify individual phones there. They are accessing certain things you don’t need to see the message being transmitted to make your point.
minus-squareforwhomthecattolls@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month agogood point! an IMSI catcher without MiTM capability would do the trick, you don’t need to decrypt traffic to have the intended effect
You don’t need to see the content on the phone just identify individual phones there. They are accessing certain things you don’t need to see the message being transmitted to make your point.
good point! an IMSI catcher without MiTM capability would do the trick, you don’t need to decrypt traffic to have the intended effect