SantasMagicalComfort@piefed.world to 196@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agoChain rule (not that one)piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up1119arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone
arrow-up1114arrow-down1imageChain rule (not that one)piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneSantasMagicalComfort@piefed.world to 196@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square11fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-squareSantasMagicalComfort@piefed.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·7 days agoYeah but what if you don’t?
minus-squaresupersquirrel@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 days agoThat would be outside the calculus of this question.
minus-squareSantasMagicalComfort@piefed.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·7 days agoThere is no question though.
minus-squaresupersquirrel@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-27 days agoYes there is, the integral of a question is an answer and the integral of answer is a rule, thus if there is a rule there is a second derivative of it that is the originating question.
minus-squareSantasMagicalComfort@piefed.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·7 days agoI’m sorry but I don’t believe in philosophy.
Yeah but what if you don’t?
That would be outside the calculus of this question.
There is no question though.
Yes there is, the integral of a question is an answer and the integral of answer is a rule, thus if there is a rule there is a second derivative of it that is the originating question.
I’m sorry but I don’t believe in philosophy.
I agree math is nonsense