LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 hours agoI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up1305arrow-down134
arrow-up1271arrow-down1imageI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 hours agomessage-square91fedilink
minus-squareTheRedSpade@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·8 hours agoHow can you be sure it’s not defined when we only see one line?
minus-squareVoroxpete@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-24 hours agoThey didn’t say it’s not defined, they said it’s not a valid name. Most languages don’t allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case. But that’s assuming this isn’t some really obscure language.
How can you be sure it’s not defined when we only see one line?
They didn’t say it’s not defined, they said it’s not a valid name. Most languages don’t allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case.
But that’s assuming this isn’t some really obscure language.