• MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This sounds a lot like “trickle down economics”

    And we all know that’s worked great in the past.

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yes that’s it. Trickle down doesn’t work because they don’t buy enough yachts.

      The proof is: If they actually bought yachts for all their money, they wouldn’t be billionaires anymore. Billionaires wouldn’t exist if trickle down worked.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        If they spent every available dollar they had on yachts, then trickle-down economics would work. But, obviously they don’t.

        On the other hand, if you hand a poor person $1000, it’s going to be spent almost immediately. Debts will be paid off, essential repairs will be done, groceries will be purchased, family members in need will be helped. That money won’t “trickle down” because there’s no “down” from there, but it will quickly spread across the economy.

        There is some value in giving a rich person, or a rich company money. Poor people aren’t able to make investments in the future because they have so many pressing immediate needs. A person or company might put some money towards something that won’t pay off for years or maybe decades. So, there’s some value in that. With too much money, investments are no longer smart because it doesn’t matter anymore.