DJ Calvert told BBC News NI: “I’ve been let down - and I’m not the only one.”

It was proof that Northern Ireland’s health and social care system had “crashed”, said the 49-year-old.

  • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes but their is not real answer to that. Even comunism where people own the means of production. Turns into a state where the leaders of that state make more money owning the machines then the workers on those machines.

    Any system will always result in a cost to start the industry be it land in the past. Machines in the present or AI in the future. Those who have the resources to provide work for others will always have some form of power. And power will always lead to corruption.

    All differing political stratagies do is change the process for gaining that power.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Humanity would probably have to eliminate psycho/sociopathic behavior. Something like 1% of humanity (much higher rate in billionaire and CEO populations, like 25%+).

      Like you said, designing a system that prevents them from taking control without pretty draconian measures that are likely to catch many false positives (and still be evaded by skilled psycho/sociopaths) seems pretty difficult.

      Maybe AI will be able to filter them out of the population, but that’s full of moral and ethical pitfalls too.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Turns into a state where the leaders of that state make more money owning the machines then the workers on those machines.

      Except not really. Corruption is a problem but corruption happens in bourgeois democracy too, the overwhelmingly main source of wealth extraction that we can eliminate is surplus labor value extraction brought about by property relations. State socialism cuts away a massive problem while still retaining smaller ones.