• Ferrous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    No 4k120Hz. bummer. To be fair, 4k120hz is not a primary market pull.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Fair enough. The displayport has limited use though, given how there aren’t many (any?) large 4k120hz televisions with displayport. And let me be clear, that’s no dig against displayport (which is the better standard). As far as I know, certain shady license deals keep hdmi artificially ubiquitous on televisions.

        • vividspecter@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          That same shadiness is why AMD GPUs can’t directly support HDMI 2.1 on Linux. But there are workarounds like DP to HDMI converters or using 4:2:0 which is tolerable for non-HDR gaming at least (not so much general PC use).

    • brrt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeh this will make it a tough choice for me. Have an OLED TV and playing something like Hades 2 in 4K120 would be really nice. Maybe a USBC hub/adapter could do the trick but that’s kinda weird and an extra cost. Definitely dampened my hype for it sadly.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Eh, that’s not really how it works. It all comes down to the HDMI standard. The HDMI 2.0 used by the steam box has a max officially supported output of 4k60hz. You need HDMI 2.1 to get 4k 120hz - regardless of the capability of your machine.