I never used an angry word. I’ve been nothing but civil. And I’m sorry I couldn’t explain your own logic to you well enough. That’s my failing.
You may be better served reading up on Behavior Modification Therapy. It’s more effective at producing positive changes in people, then the blanket shunning your doing.
You do come across as angry, but if not you should do some self reflecting on why people take your style of tone as being upset and angry. Right now you seem to have shifted to being passive aggressive.
Yah. That makes sense. After re-reading everything there are no aggressive statements; No explitives or insults. There’s nothing in thewords themselves displaying anger.
However it is common for people to see disagreement or contention as a hostile attack. Especially when contesting a perceived morality. The only sensible reason I can see my words would appear angry to you, is that you’re reading my words with your emotions and conflating the two.
So if I angered you in my questioning the validity of your moral condemnation, I apologize. It’s a regrettable consequence. One that’s common enough, I should have predicted it. I might have handled things differently if I had.
Even my previous comment you called passive agressive, was intended to be condescending. I could have softened that more.
I never used an angry word. I’ve been nothing but civil. And I’m sorry I couldn’t explain your own logic to you well enough. That’s my failing.
You may be better served reading up on Behavior Modification Therapy. It’s more effective at producing positive changes in people, then the blanket shunning your doing.
You do come across as angry, but if not you should do some self reflecting on why people take your style of tone as being upset and angry. Right now you seem to have shifted to being passive aggressive.
Yah. That makes sense. After re-reading everything there are no aggressive statements; No explitives or insults. There’s nothing in thewords themselves displaying anger.
However it is common for people to see disagreement or contention as a hostile attack. Especially when contesting a perceived morality. The only sensible reason I can see my words would appear angry to you, is that you’re reading my words with your emotions and conflating the two.
So if I angered you in my questioning the validity of your moral condemnation, I apologize. It’s a regrettable consequence. One that’s common enough, I should have predicted it. I might have handled things differently if I had.
Even my previous comment you called passive agressive, was intended to be condescending. I could have softened that more.