• Scoopta@programming.dev
    27·
    6 days ago

    What am I missing? This seems to be for VFS for git which as far as I can tell is different from git LFS.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      21·
      6 days ago

      That’s what this looks like to me as well. “Notice: With the release of VFS for Git 2.32, VFS for Git is in maintenance mode”, so they actually renamed GVFS to VFS for Git (lol). Git LFS on the other hand has been public under this nae for over 9 years, the linked PR is just 7 years old, and I doubt MS would have this much influence over Git and the Software Freedom Conservancy.

  • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.netEnglish
    7·
    6 days ago

    good thing git is independent from microsoft and they can do whatever the fuck they want once microsoft donates this code

  • Cevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    4·
    5 days ago

    “VFS for Git” doesn’t even meet the first two of the three guidelines. And it’s questionable how descriptive it is (I suppose Real Programmers™ would know what VFS are or why you’d want some, but I sure don’t).