• ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    My good PMs understood that their role was to attend meetings and create a buffer between myself (who understood what had to be done and was doing most of the work) and the higher-ups. The awful PMs were the ones who thought they were running the show and driving everything.

    • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Our current PM gets involved in projects from day dot. Plans out vague technical ideas, makes up timelines, gets involved in meetings and suggests things to clients, totally rules the roost.

      Shame she’s completely fucking clueless about any of the actual work, really.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I usually preferred male PMs, solely because my contempt for their lack of technical knowledge was never mistaken for chauvinism. Women PMs who stayed in their lane – or even better were actually technically competent – were A-OK with me.

        • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Oh yeah, it’s difficult to criticise her because it is a bloke criticising a woman and it just comes off poorly, despite my issues with her being absolutely nothing to do with her identity. I think I’ve had one or two mostly good PMs in maybe eight jobs across my career so far?