• pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    So last question, I promise.

    A wind turbine collects the energy of the wind through movement. A gear can give more “force,” so I’m assuming more movement of something. If you have 2 different systems, one that collects the movement, or more “force,” and one that is making the bike move, why wouldn’t that be close to collecting as much as you put in. You’d have to charge occasionally, but not all of the time.

    • Jesusaurus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      With the bike, the battery (and pedaling) is the source of your net energy output. Losses from friction to the ground and air drag will be the most significant net consumers of the energy. It doesn’t matter how the rest of that energy is moved around within the system(s) of the bike.

      Ultimately, what determines the distance you travel is the capacity of the battery and what external environmental factors affect the bike and by how much. Biking at 3m/s will have less air drag than 10m/s. Friction will be affected by the surfaces you go over, with something like mud taking more energy compared to something smooth like smooth concrete.

    • snooggums@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, they are not separate systems and you will always have significant losses of energy to friction.

      Gears change how energy is transferred, but more gears means more energy loss. Always.