• SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    That’s all part of writing it. Typing gibberish you don’t understand or that doesn’t work doesn’t count.

    • b0ber@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Not necessarily, even before having all these models, I spent most of my time thinking rather than coding. The coding part is just the final nail, that’s my approach at least.

      • Ignotum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Same here really, i plan the structure, then have ai throw it together, then i clean up and build off of that

        I can’t say i particularly miss writing the mindless boilerplate stuff

        • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Surely missing that process, you forget error handling. As you write, its consistently, what if this is null, what if the input is like x. There are many questions you should ask yourself and if you AI it, you’ll forget.

          • Ignotum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            29 minutes ago

            In my experience, the ai generate code has better error handling than code i write myself

            I’m lazy so i only write if it’s important (and i think of it), the AI is less lazy and often codes quite defensively in my experience