• ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Look at those sleek lines, it all interlocks.

      AV7 is clearly the best.

      Av7 - oh god imagine if you pulled that seven in a bit. Sexy.

    • commander@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Streaming sites use them so there’s a solid chance you’ve used it plenty without actively choosing to

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t use it, I can’t speak to anyone else using it. If YouTube is sending it out that’s them using it. None of my files are that codec.

    • bayleaf@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      My problem with AV1 is that so many people I talk to in real life about it think I’m mispronouncing AVI (Audio Video Interleave), the old container format that was popular in the 90s and early 2000s. I tell them it’s a video codec and they act all surprised like H.264 and H.265 are the only ones in existence.

      • richmondez@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Are you sure that’s many people? Outside of the few tech savvy people I know, most lay people have no clue what h.264/5 are either. They know mp3 and that just means digital music to them.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Honestly, that’s how the codec game works. Most people or software don’t adopt until after the successor is in place. It’s more about the software side lagging to adopt though. Nvidia just got AV1 into their hardware processing pipeline in the last 2 years. I think AMD is even more recent than that.

      • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        that’s how the codec game works.

        That, and add some patent pools filled with dubious claims of essentiality, sales deals made under the threat of litigation, and ever-present claims of “twice as efficient it’s predecessor” with a big asterisk. Fun times.

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why do we need more codecs? Technical progress is nice but unless the new thing is literally 5x better than the old thing, media codecs are for practical purposes a solved problem by now. Slight improvements aren’t worth the churn and patent hazards.

      • ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yes and no. Hardware = pay google - Proprietary software = pay google or 3rd party - Open source (d@v1d) = free (this is what most people use = VLC Player)

      • solrize@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I don’t know, but if it is, why take chances with yet another codec? The hazard is less about the developers asserting patents than trolls coming out of the woodwork after the codec is deployed.

        • Waryle@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          AV1 and AV2 are both patent free and nobody will be able to grab them to be a patent troll, that’s the point. Maybe you should start educating yourself a bit on the subject before ranting?

          • solrize@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Patent troll = someone pops up claiming av1 or av2 infringes on some obscure patent that they control. That happens all the time. There’s no way to guarantee that it won’t happen with any codec or really with anything. It is very expensive to defend against even when the claim is bogus.

            • Waryle@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              24 hours ago

              That happens all the time. There’s no way to guarantee that it won’t happen with any codec or really with anything.

              Yes, so there’s no reason to hold back on releasing updates, since it could very well happen on AV1.

              It is very expensive to defend against even when the claim is bogus.

              The principle behind AV1, once again, is to have a modern codec that is out of reach from patent trolls. Those who are part of the AOM consortium, which developed this codec, have all contractually agreed to unconditionally license all patents they hold that are necessary for the implementation of the codec.

              And those who are not part of the consortium and who would like to claim patents relating to the AV1 or AV2 codecs would have to face the legal teams of the companies part of said consortium, including Amazon, Alibaba, Adobe, AMD, Cisco, Google, Intel, Microsoft, Mozilla Foundation, ARM, Huawei, Samsung, Tencent, Meta, Nvidia, Apple, Netflix, and other large companies.

              The AV1 and AV2 codecs, after perhaps H264, are the most secure codecs available today in terms of patent trolls. Nobody has both the will and the means to attack it.