• chaos@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The right thing is to make it opt-in for everyone, simple as that. The entire controversy goes away immediately if they do. If they really believe it’s a good value proposition for their users, and want to avoid collecting data from people who didn’t actually want to give it, they should have faith that their users will agree and affirmatively check the box.

    If free users are really such a drain on them, why have they been offering a free version for so long before it became a conduit to that sweet, sweet data? Because it isn’t a drain, it’s a win-win. They want people using their IDE, even for free, they don’t get money from it but they get market share, broad familiarity with their tool amongst software engineers, a larger user base that can support each other on third party sites and provide free advertising, and more.

    • CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      The right thing is to make it opt-in for everyone

      How is that the right thing? I’m directly challenging this claim.

      All I said was that free users cost them money, so it’s reasonable for them to try to recover those costs. I never claimed that free users are a drain on them, so I won’t even respond to the rest of your comment.