Or should I go 11 > 12 > 13?


Edit: Thanks for all the replies. I asked this out of laziness and apparently trying this is not a lazy thing to do. I’m not Bilbo Baggins seeking an adventure. Will go with 11 > 12 > 13 way, though might stay at 12 for a while at this point. You know, lazy. :)

Edit 2: Updated to 12. Haven’t checked all the configs yet but so far so good, at least every function I expect works. If I finish this checking sequence, I might go for 13 soon too.

  • non_burglar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Honestly, there were so many fundamental changes in the 13 upgrade for certain packages that I had to fix on a couple of machines that I’d be hesitant to try no-scoping the 11 > 13 upgrade.

    I flew by the seat of my pants and managed to pull off 10 directly to 12, but I wouldn’t do it for this one.

    • muhyb@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Well, if there are issues like even in normal upgrade, it’s better not to jump on a thing like this.

      Still, it’s good to know that this is technically possible, though it’s not for a lazy person who just wants to update his server. Gotta check Debian changelog.