• Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 个月前

    but I don’t see Uber being at any sort of fault here unless their policy is no animals

    If it is about a neccessary service dog, then it’s not up to them (or their policy) to decide. At least, it shouldn’t be.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 个月前

        No, it isn’t. The ADA is very clear in this.

        Oh, and once you start using your vehicle for business purposes, especially transporting people for money, it’s no longer a “personal vehicle”.

      • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 个月前

        But it’s up to the driver whether to allow

        No. Doing public transport as a business means, it is public now and it must not be up to the driver’s mood anymore (within reasonable boundaries that should be defined by some law).