• ozoned@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Yes I do need more evidence then that. Snopes is known as a trustworthy source. So it makes sense for Facebook to hire them. Did Snopes compromise their integrity it did they try to do the job the best they can?

    What you’re suggesting is basically on the level of an attorney decides to defend someone in a murder, even if that person didn’t commit it, that the attorney should also be charged on the murder if found guilty. That’s not how it works.

    You can attempt to do good, even while working with someone awful. Guilt by association is draconian.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Guilt by association is applicable in digital space, because you are not obliged to do it by anyone.

      You employed reductio ad absurdum in conflating this with “reeee defendant attorney of murderer is murderer”. Pretty bad argument I would say. If you are trying to tell me associating with someone voluntarily is not a problem, then you need to change some of what you learnt.

      • ozoned@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        Awesome, so instead of actually giving evidence and attempting to push the conversation forward by offering better solutions, instead you just insult people got it.