• troed@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Why? That has nothing to do with the topic we’re discussing. You can configure Linux as Android does it, or choose not to.

      (Secure Boot is what enables “Verified boot” - which is just Android’s name for a common sense secure boot loader implementation which is the norm in well protected IoT systems etc)

      /ex Sony Mobile dev, nowadays IoT hw/fw ethical hacker

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Android boots in layers that are encrypted with different keys. The first key in the TPM enlocks the base OS up to the lock screen. From there a pin is entered and the rest of the system is decrypted.

        If a compromise happened in the OS the phone would just fail to boot since the integrity of the system is validated by the TPM.

        • troed@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yes, that’s how a normal bootchain works in every system ever - like the IoT device running Linux I’m right now working with.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It doesn’t though

            Standard Linux doesn’t check for tampering since that requires hardware and firmware support.

            • troed@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I’m sorry but you really have no idea what you’re talking about. Several distros ship with SELinux and Secure Boot by default.

      • Turret3857@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        2026 is year of Linux phone

        Linux sucks on phones for security

        Why?

        Linux security on phones is not equivalent due to these factors

        but Linux supports these things which are either not exact equivalents or would take an entire Dev team with full time funding to do

        Can you find me a phone & OS that meets those requirements

        Why? that has nothing to do with the topic of Linux security on phones?

        are you being serious with me right now? what about my question wasn’t “on topic”? If the hardware and software don’t exist, its not going to happen and you’re making a hypothetical argument to a factual statement.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I would love some more open hardware. I think it is possible for it to happen as long as there is a market for it. The difficult part is getting a 5G chipset that isn’t completely tied to a vendor kernel.

        • troed@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Linux does not suck on phones regarding security. Linux is what brings the security mechanisms faulty ascribed to as being “Android’s”. See previous posters claiming it was all “extensive modifications” by Android and not just Linux security mechanisms.

          Feel free to get a Fairphone 4, sign your Ubuntu Touch image with keys supported by the chipset and off you go. The fact that no one is selling you that has no relevance whatsoever to whether “Linux” supports it.