• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    How the hell isn’t it?

    Because it is true, the channel could be deleted, and it was an obvious attempt by Bloomberg to silence him, which he shows many reason for why they may want to do in the video.

    When it is true it is not clickbait.

    Youtube sided with them, the copyright strike got reverted and the video restored.

    For the fourth time, it is NOT reverted, and the video is NOT restored.

    It takes three copyright strikes to delete a channel.

    Maybe it is the third? You don’t know, at least you haven’t shown anything to indicate that you do.

    And I will add my own 3: YouTube will never just outright delete a cashcow channel like GamersNexus.

    Again Gamers Nexus is small fry for YouTube.

    LOL “I’m right because I got more upvotes”.

    No you make false claims, and was downvoted for it. Usually click bait is an easily accepted answer, but here it was not because you are wrong.

    • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      How the fuck are you so dense?

      Read my whole comment. It is demonstrably NOT true.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I did and edited my comment, adding more false claims doesn’t make you right.
        Also it’s rich calling me dense, when you repeatedly make the same false claim that the take down is reverted when it is not. It’s explained very clearly in the video, that it takes 10 days from filing the complaint, and if Bloomberg persist on the issue, the take down stands.

        You are very dense to not accept that when it’s explained to you at least three times!!!

        • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          It’s explained very clearly in the video, that it takes 10 days from filing the complaint. If Bloomberg persist on the issue, the take down stands.

          I addressed this. Bloomberg must press actual legal charges for the takedown to stand, and provide proof to Youtube. This is mentioned very around 7:32 in the video. Here’s a screenshot:

          YouTube is basically saying to Bloomberg: yeah, we are ruling that this is not infringement, but if you still disagree and really want to press the issue… put your money where your mouth is and provide proof that you filed actual legal charges. They’re only doing what is legally required of them by the DMCA.

          And, as you conveniently keep ignoring, even if alllll this ends up with Bloomberg suing GamersNexus in a court of law and winning (a highly unlikely outcome) and the video being permanently delisted… that is still only 1 copyright strike, and not enough for “The Channel To Be Deleted!!!”. It basically takes 3 strikes within the same 90 days for a channel to be subject to deletion. Ergo: it is fucking click bait. Their channel is not and never was in danger of being deleted.